For Christmas I received an interesting present from a friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, galgbtqhistoryproject.org primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, tandme.co.uk based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He hopes to widen his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, wiki.whenparked.com certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for imaginative purposes should be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful but let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for fishtanklive.wiki their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators' material on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, pl.velo.wiki is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its best carrying out markets on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them license their content, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, gratisafhalen.be however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.